[Contains spoilers for Superman/Batman: Torment]It's hard to say whether
Superman/Batman: Torment presents the right direction for the
Superman/Batman title. That is,
Torment tells a good (not great)
Superman/Batman story, but flies in the face of continuity to do it. This is something we also saw in the previous volume,
Superman/Batman: Enemies Among Us, though
Torment is even more loosely connected, and I'm not sure this trend will necessarily work for the title.
Consider
Torment versus the first, and possibly best,
Superman/Batman story,
Public Enemies.
Public Enemies took place distinctly shortly after
Batman: Hush, and dealt with Superman and Batman's overthrow of President Luthor -- a monumental event in DC Comics history that began the universe's move toward
Infinite Crisis. Now consider
Torment, which takes place in a tricky period after Luthor's fall but before
Infinite Crisis*, and whose relevance is quite essentially nil. There's a very minor
Final Crisis tie at the end, but overall this book affects nothing, and is even set in the past where it
can't affect anything. Both stories are like summer blockbusters, and in that way perhaps worthy of the
Superman/Batman title; but whereas
Superman/Batman (mainly under Jeph Loeb) used to be built on summer blockbuster
events,
Torment is all the fanfare without the relevance.
Which is not to say that
Torment is a bad story. Most of the appeal of the tale came for me in Burnett's mixing of DC's two main fear-based bad guys, the Scarecrow and Desaad; in that way,
Torment covers some new ground.
Torment also offers some techno-punk-eseque scenes of Batman amongst the New Gods, and it's always exciting to see the "normal" Batman in these "paranormal" situations (though unfortunately,
Torment, for a
Superman/Batman tale, becomes largely Batman's story when Superman is lost to mind-control early on). This was also my first introduction to the New God Bekka, married apparently to Orion, and I found her difficult relationship with Batman quite interesting; there's a great moment when the two must stand in an awkward embrace, hidden from the Parademons that surround them on all sides.
I did struggle to understand what Burnett was trying to say about Superman and Batman here -- not that every comic has to have a "message," but oftentimes Jeph Loeb's
Superman/Batman stories explored in some underlying way either the heroes themselves, or questions of justice or heroism. The "torment" in the title seems to apply most directly to the way in which Superman is plagued by Scarecrow-induced fears at the beginning of the story (though Scarecrow, strangely, also falls away about halfway through the tale). "Torment" can also apply, a bit more metaphorically, to the way Batman suffers for his desire for Bekka, and indeed his consideration of the way he's denied himself love throughout his life.
Though nicely moving, I didn't think these insights into Batman were especially new, and indeed many of them are no longer true of the more emotional post-
Infinite Crisis Batman. There's a good moment in the end where Superman, newly rescued, celebrates being alive while in contrast Batman, cut off from Bekka, rues the day -- but this served in a way only to reinforce the separate directions in which Burnett seemed to be pulling the story.
Superman/Batman: Torment isn't a bad story, and artist Dustin Nguyen creates a visual feast the whole way through. But
Superman/Batman used to be a super-relevant must-read -- and if the trend shown here continues, I'll soon be questioning whether to even pick it up right away. I hope that's not the case.
[Contains full covers, Dustin Nguyen sketchbook section]Up next: More Superman with
Superman: The Third Kryptonian!
* For you continuity wonks out there, the problem is the appearance of Lex Luthor in this trade. Pete Ross is president here, placing the story after
Superman/Batman: Public Enemies, where Lex Luthor went missing before
Infinite Crisis -- except Lex appears here, seemingly still in charge of Lexcorp (called Lex-Com in the story). One might suggest that Lex was simply operating under the heroes' radar during this time, except that Batman actually questions Lex in the story! We might perhaps resolve that maybe Batman knew where Lex was during this time, but Superman didn't, but there's any number of stories to contradict this. In all likelihood, Burnett and his editor just didn't concern themselves with where this story fit into continuity. I think the continuity lapse takes away from the story, but others might disagree.
